NBANFLCFBCBB NO DATA
Slate
Our fair line for every game.
Props
Schedule
Picks
Every pick logged from the slate, graded as results land. Add the closing line to score it: closing line value, not wins, says whether the model has an edge.
Files
No picks yet. Enter your book’s line on a slate card and press Log pick.
Picks are saved in this browser. Back up now and then (under Files): clearing the browser’s site data deletes them, and another browser or device will not see them.
Backtest
Walk-forward against the closing line. Settings were chosen on 2012–18; the 2019–25 test seasons played no part in choosing them.
The charts and tables, explained
The scorecard

What this shows: the grade and the numbers behind it, over the seven test seasons. A typical miss is how many points the line was off from the final margin in an ordinary game (statisticians call it RMSE). Difference is ours minus the market’s, and luck is how much it could wobble by chance. The win-chance score grades our percentages: lower is better, and guessing 50% every game scores 0.693.

What the model learned

What this shows: the settings Method A worked out for itself from past games: what home field, a bye, a short or long week and travel are worth in points, how quickly a rating forgets old games and how much of last season it keeps. Spread of misses says how far a real score usually lands from our line, which is how a line becomes a win chance. Beyond the market asks whether our line knows anything the market’s doesn’t: 0 means no.

Season by season

What this shows: how far off we were each season, next to the market. Difference is ours minus the market’s; green means within the half-point goal. Tune seasons set the model up; Test seasons are the exam it never saw.

Win chances, and where we miss the most
◆ Chance we gave the home team to win, against how often it won
◆ How many more points we missed by than the market, by what was going on
The gold line is the half-point goal. Shorter bars are better.

What this shows: on the left, each dot is a group of games where we gave the home team about the same chance to win; bigger dots hold more games. Dots near the dashed line mean our percentages can be trusted. On the right, the longest bar is games where a team changed quarterbacks: Method A only sees scores, so it learns about a new starter from the losses. That is the job of Method C. Weeks 1–4 are hard too, while ratings catch up with the off-season.

Betting our side of the market’s spread
◆ How often our side won, by how far apart we were
The gold line is 52.4%, what you need to win to make money at the usual price.

What this shows: what you would have won betting our side every time our line was at least that many points from the market’s. Every bar sits near 50%: when we disagree with the market, we are not more likely to be right.

Games where we disagreed most with the market

What this shows: the ten test games where our line and the market’s were furthest apart, with the final score and what was going on. Most are quarterback changes: the market knew who was starting, and Method A didn’t.

Standings
News
Notes are Rotowire’s, as ESPN’s fantasy app shows them; who is out is ESPN’s injury report as of now. Both are read from ESPN when this tab opens and kept ten minutes. Book lines are the newest this browser has seen, as on the Slate.
Lines Monitor · 2026 · forecasts by Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · data by nflverse